气候变化领域集成服务门户(CCPortal): Contested framings of greenhouse gas removal and its feasibility: Social and political dimensions

CCPortal

DOI	10.1002/wcc.649
	Contested framings of greenhouse gas removal and its feasibility: Social and political dimensions
	Waller L.; Rayner T.; Chilvers J.; Gough C.A.; Lorenzoni I.; Jordan A.; Vaughan N.
发表日期	2020
ISSN	1757-7780
EISSN	1757-7779
卷号	11 期号:4
英文摘要	Prospective approaches for large-scale greenhouse gas removal (GGR) are now central to the post-2020 international commitment to pursue efforts to limit the global temperature increase to 1.5°C. However, the feasibility of large-scale GGR has been repeatedly questioned. Most systematic analyses focus only on the physical, technical, and economic challenges of deploying it at scale. However, social and political dimensions will be just as important, if not more so, to how possible futures play out. We conduct one of the first reviews of the international peer-reviewed literature pertaining to the social and political dimensions of large-scale GGR, with a specific focus on two predominant approaches: Biomass energy with carbon capture and storage (BECCS) and afforestation/reforestation (AR). Our analysis of 78 studies proposes two important insights. First, it shows how six key social and political dimensions of GGR feasibility–namely economics and incentives; innovation; societal engagement; governance; complexity and uncertainty; and ethics, equity, and justice–are identifiable and are emphasized to varying degrees in the literature. Second, there are three contested ways in which BECCS and AR and their feasibility are being framed in the literature: (a) a techno-economic framing; (b) a social and political acceptability framing; and (c) a responsible development framing. We suggest this third frame will, and indeed should, become increasingly pertinent to the assessment, innovation, and governance of climate futures. This article is categorized under: The Carbon Economy and Climate Mitigation > Policies, Instruments, Lifestyles, Behavior. © 2020 The Authors. WIREs Climate Change published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.
英文关键词	afforestation; biomass energy with carbon capture and storage; feasibility; framing; greenhouse gas removal; social and political dimensions
语种	英语
scopus关键词	Carbon capture; Economics; Reforestation; Afforestation/reforestation; Climate mitigations; Economic challenges; Global temperatures; Political acceptability; Political dimensions; Systematic analysis; Techno-economics; Greenhouse gases
来源期刊	Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change
文献类型	期刊论文
条目标识符	http://gcip.llas.ac.cn/handle/2XKMVOVA/129879
作者单位	School of Environmental Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, United Kingdom; Science, Society & Sustainability (3S) Research Group, University of East Anglia, Norwich, United Kingdom; Tyndall Centre for Climate Change Research, University of East Anglia, Norwich, United Kingdom; Tyndall Centre for Climate Change Research, School of Mechanical, Aerospace and Civil Engineering, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714	Waller L.,Rayner T.,Chilvers J.,et al. Contested framings of greenhouse gas removal and its feasibility: Social and political dimensions[J],2020,11(4).
APA	Waller L..,Rayner T..,Chilvers J..,Gough C.A..,Lorenzoni I..,...&Vaughan N..(2020).Contested framings of greenhouse gas removal and its feasibility: Social and political dimensions.Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change,11(4).
MLA	Waller L.,et al."Contested framings of greenhouse gas removal and its feasibility: Social and political dimensions".Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change 11.4(2020).