CCPortal
DOI10.1029/2019GB006202
Soil COS Exchange: A Comparison of Three European Ecosystems
Kitz F.; Spielmann F.M.; Hammerle A.; Kolle O.; Migliavacca M.; Moreno G.; Ibrom A.; Krasnov D.; Noe S.M.; Wohlfahrt G.
发表日期2020
ISSN0886-6236
EISSN1944-9224
卷号34期号:4
英文摘要The potential of carbonyl sulfide (COS) flux measurements as an additional constraint for estimating the gross primary production depends, among other preconditions, on our understanding of the soil COS exchange and its contribution to the overall net ecosystem COS flux. We conducted soil chamber measurements of COS, with transparent chambers, in three different ecosystems across Europe. The in situ measurements were followed by laboratory measurements of soil samples collected at the study sites. The soil samples were exposed to UV radiation to investigate the role of photo-degradation for COS exchange. In situ and laboratory measurements revealed pronounced intersite and intrasite variability of COS exchange. In situ COS fluxes were primarily governed by radiation in the savannah-like grassland (SAV), soil temperature and intrasite heterogeneity in the deciduous broadleaf forest, and soil water content and intrasite heterogeneity in the evergreen needleleaf forest. The soil of the ecosystem with the highest light intensity incident on the soil surface, SAV, was a net source for COS, while the soils of the other two ecosystems were COS sinks. UV radiation increased COS emissions and/or reduced COS uptake from all soil samples under laboratory conditions. The impact of UV on the COS flux differed between soil samples, with a tendency toward a stronger response of the COS flux to UV radiation exposure in samples with higher soil organic matter content. Our results emphasize the importance of photo-degradation for the soil COS flux and stress the substantial spatial variability of soil COS exchange in ecosystems. ©2020. The Authors.
英文关键词carbonyl sulfide; COS; soil gas exchange; soil respiration; UV radiation
语种英语
scopus关键词carbon flux; comparative study; grassland soil; net ecosystem exchange; savanna; soil emission; soil temperature; soil water; sulfide; ultraviolet radiation
来源期刊Global Biogeochemical Cycles
文献类型期刊论文
条目标识符http://gcip.llas.ac.cn/handle/2XKMVOVA/129652
作者单位Institute of Ecology, University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria; Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry, Jena, Germany; Forest Research Group, Universidad de Extremadura, Plasencia, Spain; Department of Environmental Engineering, Technical University of Denmark, Kongens Lyngby, Denmark; Institute of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, Estonian University of Life Sciences, Tartu, Estonia
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Kitz F.,Spielmann F.M.,Hammerle A.,et al. Soil COS Exchange: A Comparison of Three European Ecosystems[J],2020,34(4).
APA Kitz F..,Spielmann F.M..,Hammerle A..,Kolle O..,Migliavacca M..,...&Wohlfahrt G..(2020).Soil COS Exchange: A Comparison of Three European Ecosystems.Global Biogeochemical Cycles,34(4).
MLA Kitz F.,et al."Soil COS Exchange: A Comparison of Three European Ecosystems".Global Biogeochemical Cycles 34.4(2020).
条目包含的文件
条目无相关文件。
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[Kitz F.]的文章
[Spielmann F.M.]的文章
[Hammerle A.]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[Kitz F.]的文章
[Spielmann F.M.]的文章
[Hammerle A.]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[Kitz F.]的文章
[Spielmann F.M.]的文章
[Hammerle A.]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。