Climate Change Data Portal
DOI | 10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.114749 |
Planning with justice: Using spatial modelling to incorporate justice in electricity pricing – The case of Tanzania | |
Menghwani V.; Zerriffi H.; Korkovelos A.; Khavari B.; Sahlberg A.; Howells M.; Mentis D. | |
发表日期 | 2020 |
ISSN | 3062619 |
卷号 | 264 |
英文摘要 | Universal electrification by 2030 is an important goal of Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) 7. Electricity provision no longer relies only on centralized grid expansion, but also on off-grid and mini-grid systems. Although this technological diversity holds promise, the technologies differ both physically and institutionally in electricity delivery. These differences raise equity and justice concerns around how they are implemented. For example, how can electricity be kept affordable for all consumers when access is provided by various technologies operated under different business models? This paper addresses this aspect of affordability and sheds light on how the SDG7 target could be met more equitably and fairly. We use a novel analytical methodology to apply two different principles of justice – equality and equity – to incorporate affordability into electricity pricing. Using a geospatial electrification model and Tanzania as a case study, we first arrive at price levels based on the principle(s) of justice. Then, we produce location-specific recommendations for subsidy levels needed to ensure those price levels. We find that the equity approach benefits a bigger section of the population than the equality approach. Moreover, the former costs significantly less per capita than the latter. Having said that, the equity approach is complex and therefore harder to implement. The methodological framework proposed in this study acts as a proof-of-concept for examining concerns around distributive justice using quantitative energy modelling tools and drawing policy relevant insights for energy planning in developing countries. Additionally, by focusing on the spatial aspects of energy access and the issue of fairness, the study also contributes to the growing conceptualizations of energy justice. © 2020 Elsevier Ltd |
英文关键词 | Energy access; Energy justice; Energy systems modelling; GIS; OnSSET; Tanzania |
scopus关键词 | Costs; Developing countries; Geographic information systems; Energy access; Energy justices; Energy systems; OnSSET; Tanzania; Power markets; electricity; electrification; energy planning; equity; GIS; modeling; Sustainable Development Goal; Tanzania |
来源期刊 | Applied Energy |
来源机构 | 世界资源研究所 |
文献类型 | 期刊论文 |
条目标识符 | http://gcip.llas.ac.cn/handle/2XKMVOVA/125942 |
作者单位 | Institute for Resources, Environment and Sustainability, AERL Building, 429-2202 Main Mall, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada; Department of Forest Resources Management, Forest Sciences Centre, 2424 Main Mall, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada; Division of Energy Systems, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Brinellvägen 68, Stockholm, 10044, Sweden; Department of Geography and Environment, Loughborough University, Leicestershire, LE113TU, United Kingdom; Center for Environmental Policy, Imperial College, London, SW71NE, United Kingdom; World Resources Institute, 10 G Street NE Suite 800, Washington, DC, 20002, United States |
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Menghwani V.,Zerriffi H.,Korkovelos A.,等. Planning with justice: Using spatial modelling to incorporate justice in electricity pricing – The case of Tanzania[J]. 世界资源研究所,2020,264. |
APA | Menghwani V..,Zerriffi H..,Korkovelos A..,Khavari B..,Sahlberg A..,...&Mentis D..(2020).Planning with justice: Using spatial modelling to incorporate justice in electricity pricing – The case of Tanzania.Applied Energy,264. |
MLA | Menghwani V.,et al."Planning with justice: Using spatial modelling to incorporate justice in electricity pricing – The case of Tanzania".Applied Energy 264(2020). |
条目包含的文件 | 条目无相关文件。 |
除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。