气候变化领域集成服务门户(CCPortal): Emissions trading system (ETS) implementation and its collaborative governance effects on air pollution: The China story

CCPortal

DOI	10.1016/j.enpol.2020.111282
	Emissions trading system (ETS) implementation and its collaborative governance effects on air pollution: The China story
	Yan Y.; Zhang X.; Zhang J.; Li K.
发表日期	2020
ISSN	0301-4215
卷号	138
英文摘要	The study aims to employ the difference-in-differences method and mediating effect model to assess panel data of 267 prefectural-level cities in Chinese 30 provinces from 2003 to 2016 and empirically examines whether the Emissions Trading System pilot has realized collaborative governance effects upon air pollution. This study verifies the rationality of the element design of China's Emissions Trading System pilot from the perspective of environmental effects. The results indicate that the China's Emissions Trading System pilot does have a significant ‘reduction effect’ on haze pollution concentration level, which is probably achieved by ‘boosting the application and transformation of green technologies among enterprises’ and ‘transferring heavily polluted industries’. Moreover, the total quota allocation, total number of incorporated enterprises and the entry of institutional and individual investors were not the significant influencing factors for reducing haze pollution, while the transaction volume of China Certified Emission Reduction and the total penalty amounts incurred play significant roles. The heterogeneity test shows that only Guangdong province's policy has a significantly negative effect on haze pollution concentration. This study provides a new way of thinking for the coordinated governance mode by combining environmental governance and carbon trading scheme. The experiential evidence strongly supports the establishment and improvement of China's Emissions Trading System pilots and the implementation of a unified national carbon market. © 2020
英文关键词	China'S emissions trading system pilots; Collaborative governance; Difference-in-differences (DID) method; Haze pollution
语种	英语
scopus关键词	Air pollution; Carbon; Certified emission reductions; Collaborative governances; Difference-in-differences; Emissions trading system; Environmental governances; Guangdong Province; Haze pollutions; Reduction effects; Emission control; atmospheric pollution; concentration (composition); emission control; emissions trading; governance approach; haze; panel data; policy implementation; pollution tax; China; Guangdong
来源期刊	Energy policy
文献类型	期刊论文
条目标识符	http://gcip.llas.ac.cn/handle/2XKMVOVA/124837
作者单位	Institute of Sociology, Zhongnan University of Economics and Law, Wuhan, 430073, China; Department of Public Policy, City University of Hong Kong, Tat Chee Avenue, Kowloon, Hong Kong; Shenzhen Research Institute, City University of Hong Kong, Shenzhen, 518057, Hong Kong; Southern Marine Science and Engineering Guangdong Laboratory (Zhuhai), Zhuhai, 519080, China; Institute of Quality Development Strategy, Wuhan University, Wuhan, 430072, China; Economics and Management School, Wuhan University, Wuhan, 430072, China
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714	Yan Y.,Zhang X.,Zhang J.,et al. Emissions trading system (ETS) implementation and its collaborative governance effects on air pollution: The China story[J],2020,138.
APA	Yan Y.,Zhang X.,Zhang J.,&Li K..(2020).Emissions trading system (ETS) implementation and its collaborative governance effects on air pollution: The China story.Energy policy,138.
MLA	Yan Y.,et al."Emissions trading system (ETS) implementation and its collaborative governance effects on air pollution: The China story".Energy policy 138(2020).