Climate Change Data Portal
DOI | 10.5194/tc-11-949-2017 |
How accurate are estimates of glacier ice thickness? Results from ITMIX, the Ice Thickness Models Intercomparison eXperiment | |
Farinotti D.; Brinkerhoff D.J.; Clarke G.K.C.; Fürst J.J.; Frey H.; Gantayat P.; Gillet-Chaulet F.; Girard C.; Huss M.; Leclercq P.W.; Linsbauer A.; Machguth H.; Martin C.; Maussion F.; Morlighem M.; Mosbeux C.; Pandit A.; Portmann A.; Rabatel A.; Ramsankaran R.; Reerink T.J.; Sanchez O.; Stentoft P.A.; Singh Kumari S.; Van Pelt W.J.J.; Anderson B.; Benham T.; Binder D.; Dowdeswell J.A.; Fischer A.; Helfricht K.; Kutuzov S.; Lavrentiev I.; McNabb R.; Hilmar Gudmundsson G.; Li H.; Andreassen L.M. | |
发表日期 | 2017 |
ISSN | 19940416 |
卷号 | 11期号:2 |
英文摘要 | Knowledge of the ice thickness distribution of glaciers and ice caps is an important prerequisite for many glaciological and hydrological investigations. A wealth of approaches has recently been presented for inferring ice thickness from characteristics of the surface. With the Ice Thickness Models Intercomparison eXperiment (ITMIX) we performed the first coordinated assessment quantifying individual model performance. A set of 17 different models showed that individual ice thickness estimates can differ considerably - locally by a spread comparable to the observed thickness. Averaging the results of multiple models, however, significantly improved the results: on average over the 21 considered test cases, comparison against direct ice thickness measurements revealed deviations on the order of 10 ± 24% of the mean ice thickness (1σ estimate). Models relying on multiple data sets - such as surface ice velocity fields, surface mass balance, or rates of ice thickness change - showed high sensitivity to input data quality. Together with the requirement of being able to handle large regions in an automated fashion, the capacity of better accounting for uncertainties in the input data will be a key for an improved next generation of ice thickness estimation approaches. © Author(s) 2017. |
学科领域 | data quality; data set; glacier; ice cap; ice thickness; mass balance; model validation |
语种 | 英语 |
scopus关键词 | data quality; data set; glacier; ice cap; ice thickness; mass balance; model validation |
来源期刊 | Cryosphere
![]() |
文献类型 | 期刊论文 |
条目标识符 | http://gcip.llas.ac.cn/handle/2XKMVOVA/119411 |
作者单位 | Laboratory of Hydraulics, Hydrology and Glaciology (VAW), ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland; Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research (WSL), Birmensdorf, Switzerland; Geophysical Institute, University of Alaska Fairbanks, Fairbanks, AK, United States; Department of Earth, Ocean and Atmospheric Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada; Institute of Geography, Friedrich Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany; Department of Geography, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland; Divecha Centre for Climate Change, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore, India; Institut des Géosciences de l'Environnement (IGE), Université Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, IRD, Grenoble, France; Department of Earth System Science, University of California Irvine, Irvine, CA, United States; Department of Geosciences, University of Fribourg, Fribourg, Switzerland; Department of Geosciences, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway; British Antarctic Survey, Natural Environment Re... |
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Farinotti D.,Brinkerhoff D.J.,Clarke G.K.C.,et al. How accurate are estimates of glacier ice thickness? Results from ITMIX, the Ice Thickness Models Intercomparison eXperiment[J],2017,11(2). |
APA | Farinotti D..,Brinkerhoff D.J..,Clarke G.K.C..,Fürst J.J..,Frey H..,...&Andreassen L.M..(2017).How accurate are estimates of glacier ice thickness? Results from ITMIX, the Ice Thickness Models Intercomparison eXperiment.Cryosphere,11(2). |
MLA | Farinotti D.,et al."How accurate are estimates of glacier ice thickness? Results from ITMIX, the Ice Thickness Models Intercomparison eXperiment".Cryosphere 11.2(2017). |
条目包含的文件 | 条目无相关文件。 |
除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。