气候变化领域集成服务门户(CCPortal): Effectiveness and synergies of policy instruments for land use governance in tropical regions

CCPortal

DOI	10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.06.007
	Effectiveness and synergies of policy instruments for land use governance in tropical regions
	Lambin E.F.; Meyfroidt P.; Rueda X.; Blackman A.; Börner J.; Cerutti P.O.; Dietsch T.; Jungmann L.; Lamarque P.; Lister J.; Walker N.F.; Wunder S.
发表日期	2014
ISSN	0959-3780
卷号	28 期号:1
英文摘要	Land use is regulated through various mixes of command-and-control interventions that directly affect land use via land use restrictions, and other public interventions that indirectly affect land use via agricultural, forestry, trade or macro-economic policies. More recently, coalitions of public and private actors have designed market-based and/or demand-led policy instruments to influence land use-e.g., eco-certification, geographical indications, commodity roundtables, moratoria, and payments for environmental services. These innovative instruments fall along a continuum of state involvement and interact with traditional public forms of land use regulation, leading to "hybrid" interventions. This article reviews emerging evidence on the effectiveness of the main instruments used to promote sustainable land use, and explores interactions between the new demand-led interventions and formal regulatory public policies. Although there are still insufficient rigorous studies evaluating the effectiveness of hybrid instruments, available evidence suggests some positive direct and indirect benefits. Hybrid instruments combine elements from both private and public regulatory systems, in innovative and effective ways. We propose a typology to characterize potential interactions between instruments that regulate land use. It links various types of interactions-i.e., complementarity, substitution, and antagonism-to the various stages of regulatory processes-i.e., agenda setting, implementation, and monitoring and enforcement. We give examples of governments endorsing certifications or using certification to support their own policies; governments creating enabling conditions for hybrid instruments to mature, allowing for wider adoption; and private instruments reinforcing public regulations or substituting for missing or weak governance. In some cases, governments, NGOs and corporations compete and may hinder each other's actions. With favourable institutional and governance contexts, well-designed hybrid public-private instruments can be effective. More systematic evaluation could boost the effectiveness of instruments and enhance synergistic interaction with traditional public land-use policy instruments to achieve incremental benefits as well as longer-term transformative outcomes in land-use protection. © 2014 Elsevier Ltd.
英文关键词	Certification; Commodity roundtables; Deforestation; Geographical indication; Payment for environmental services; Protected area
学科领域	certification; environmental policy; land use change; land use planning; sustainability; synergism; tropical region; commodity; deforestation; demand analysis; economic instrument; ecosystem service; environmental indicator; geographical distribution; governance approach; nongovernmental organization; policy strategy; private sector; protected area; public sector; regulatory approach; valuation; willingness to pay
语种	英语
scopus关键词	certification; environmental policy; land use change; land use planning; sustainability; synergism; tropical region; commodity; deforestation; demand analysis; economic instrument; ecosystem service; environmental indicator; geographical distribution; governance approach; nongovernmental organization; policy strategy; private sector; protected area; public sector; regulatory approach; valuation; willingness to pay
来源期刊	Global Environmental Change
文献类型	期刊论文
条目标识符	http://gcip.llas.ac.cn/handle/2XKMVOVA/117747
作者单位	Georges Lemaître Centre for Earth and Climate Research, Earth and Life Institute, Université catholique de Louvain, Place Louis Pasteur 3, Louvain-la-Neuve, 1348, Belgium; School of Earth Sciences and Woods Institute, Stanford University, 473 Via Ortega, Stanford, CA 94305, United States; F.R.S-FNRS, Belgium; School of Management, Universidad de los Andes, Carrera 1 No. 18A-12, Bogotá, Colombia; Resources for the Future, 1616 P Street, NW, Washington, DC 20036, United States; Center for Development Research, University of Bonn and Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR), Walter-Flex-Str. 3, Bonn, 53113, Germany; Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR), United Nations Avenue, Gigiri, P.O. Box 30677, Nairobi, 00100, Kenya; U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 6010 Hidden Valley Road, Carlsbad, CA 92011, United States; WWF - Netherlands, Driebergseweg 10, Zeist, 3708JB, Netherlands; Liu Institute for Global Issues, University of British Columbia, 6476 NW Marine Drive, Vancouver, BC V6T1Z...
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714	Lambin E.F.,Meyfroidt P.,Rueda X.,et al. Effectiveness and synergies of policy instruments for land use governance in tropical regions[J],2014,28(1).
APA	Lambin E.F..,Meyfroidt P..,Rueda X..,Blackman A..,Börner J..,...&Wunder S..(2014).Effectiveness and synergies of policy instruments for land use governance in tropical regions.Global Environmental Change,28(1).
MLA	Lambin E.F.,et al."Effectiveness and synergies of policy instruments for land use governance in tropical regions".Global Environmental Change 28.1(2014).