气候变化领域集成服务门户(CCPortal): Framing national REDD+ benefits, monitoring, governance and finance: A comparative analysis of seven countries

CCPortal

DOI	10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.04.002
	Framing national REDD+ benefits, monitoring, governance and finance: A comparative analysis of seven countries
	Vijge M.J.; Brockhaus M.; Di Gregorio M.; Muharrom E.
发表日期	2016
ISSN	0959-3780
卷号	39
英文摘要	This article analyzes how and with what possible consequences REDD+ is framed in the national policy arena in Cameroon, Indonesia, Nepal, Papua New Guinea, Peru, Tanzania, and Vietnam. It analyzes the most prominent views and storylines around key REDD+ design features among policy actors and in policy documents. We focus on storylines related to four questions, namely: (1) What should REDD+ achieve: carbon or also non-carbon objectives? (2) Who should monitor REDD+ outcomes: only technical experts or also local communities? (3) At what level should REDD+ be governed: at national or sub-national level? and (4) How should REDD+ be financed: through market- or fund-based sources? The vast majority of policy actors and policy documents frame REDD+ as a mechanism that should also realize non-carbon benefits, yet non-carbon monitoring receives very little attention. In all but one country, policy documents contain plans to involve local communities in the design and/or execution of measuring, reporting and verifying REDD+ outcomes. With regard to the level at which REDD+ should be governed, while most policy documents contain elements of a nested approach to accounting, almost all countries envision a long-term transition to national accounting and benefit distribution. We found strikingly little discussion among policy actors and in policy documents of how to finance REDD+ and acquire results-based payments. In the conclusion we reflect on possible consequences of the prominence of REDD+ storylines in the seven countries, and argue that carbonization and centralization of forest governance are possible outcomes given the limited attention to non-carbon monitoring and the envisioned centralized approaches to REDD+. © 2016 Elsevier Ltd.
英文关键词	Centralization; Co-benefits; Comparative discourse analysis; Market-based approach; MRV; REDD+
学科领域	centralization; comparative study; cost-benefit analysis; environmental monitoring; environmental policy; finance; governance approach; policy implementation; Cameroon; Indonesia; Nepal; Papua New Guinea; Peru; Tanzania; Viet Nam
语种	英语
scopus关键词	centralization; comparative study; cost-benefit analysis; environmental monitoring; environmental policy; finance; governance approach; policy implementation; Cameroon; Indonesia; Nepal; Papua New Guinea; Peru; Tanzania; Viet Nam
来源期刊	Global Environmental Change
文献类型	期刊论文
条目标识符	http://gcip.llas.ac.cn/handle/2XKMVOVA/117366
作者单位	Environmental Policy Group, Department of Social Sciences, Wageningen University and Research Centre, Hollandseweg 1, Wageningen, 6706 KN, Netherlands; Center for International Forestry Research, P.O. Box 0113 BOCBD, Bogor, 16000, Indonesia; University of Leeds, School of Earth and Environment, Sustainability Research Institute, Leeds, LS 29JT, United Kingdom
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714	Vijge M.J.,Brockhaus M.,Di Gregorio M.,et al. Framing national REDD+ benefits, monitoring, governance and finance: A comparative analysis of seven countries[J],2016,39.
APA	Vijge M.J.,Brockhaus M.,Di Gregorio M.,&Muharrom E..(2016).Framing national REDD+ benefits, monitoring, governance and finance: A comparative analysis of seven countries.Global Environmental Change,39.
MLA	Vijge M.J.,et al."Framing national REDD+ benefits, monitoring, governance and finance: A comparative analysis of seven countries".Global Environmental Change 39(2016).