CCPortal
DOI10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.11.005
‘Green’ on the ground but not in the air: Pro-environmental attitudes are related to household behaviours but not discretionary air travel
Alcock I.; White M.P.; Taylor T.; Coldwell D.F.; Gribble M.O.; Evans K.L.; Corner A.; Vardoulakis S.; Fleming L.E.
发表日期2017
ISSN0959-3780
卷号42
英文摘要The rise in greenhouse gas emissions from air travel could be reduced by individuals voluntarily abstaining from, or reducing, flights for leisure and recreational purposes. In theory, we might expect that people with pro-environmental value orientations and concerns about the risks of climate change, and those who engage in more pro-environmental household behaviours, would also be more likely to abstain from such voluntary air travel, or at least to fly less far. Analysis of two large datasets from the United Kingdom, weighted to be representative of the whole population, tested these associations. Using zero-inflated Poisson regression models, we found that, after accounting for potential confounders, there was no association between individuals’ environmental attitudes, concern over climate change, or their routine pro-environmental household behaviours, and either their propensity to take non-work related flights, or the distances flown by those who do so. These findings contrasted with those for pro-environmental household behaviours, where associations with environmental attitudes and concern were observed. Our results offer little encouragement for policies aiming to reduce discretionary air travel through pro-environmental advocacy, or through ‘spill-over’ from interventions to improve environmental impacts of household routines. © 2016 Elsevier Ltd
英文关键词Attitude-behaviour consistency; Climate change concerns; Discretionary air travel; Pro-environmental behaviour; Pro-environmental spill-over; Voluntary air travel
学科领域advocacy; air transportation; climate change; environmental values; greenhouse gas; household survey; human behavior; public attitude; recreational activity; spillover effect; United Kingdom
语种英语
scopus关键词advocacy; air transportation; climate change; environmental values; greenhouse gas; household survey; human behavior; public attitude; recreational activity; spillover effect; United Kingdom
来源期刊Global Environmental Change
文献类型期刊论文
条目标识符http://gcip.llas.ac.cn/handle/2XKMVOVA/117278
作者单位European Centre for Environment and Human Health, University of Exeter Medical School, Knowledge Spa, Royal Cornwall Hospital, Cornwall, Truro, TR1 3HD, United Kingdom; Animal and Plant Sciences, Alfred Denny Building, University of Sheffield, Western Bank, Sheffield, S10 2TN, United Kingdom; Department of Environmental Health, Emory University Rollins School of Public Health, 1518 Clifton Rd. NE, Mailstop 1518-002-2BB, Atlanta, GA 30322, United States; Climate Outreach, 106-108 Cowley Road, Oxford, OX4 1JE, United Kingdom; Environmental Change Department, Centre for Radiation, Chemical & Environmental Hazards, Public Health England, Harwell CampusOX11 0RQ, United Kingdom
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Alcock I.,White M.P.,Taylor T.,等. ‘Green’ on the ground but not in the air: Pro-environmental attitudes are related to household behaviours but not discretionary air travel[J],2017,42.
APA Alcock I..,White M.P..,Taylor T..,Coldwell D.F..,Gribble M.O..,...&Fleming L.E..(2017).‘Green’ on the ground but not in the air: Pro-environmental attitudes are related to household behaviours but not discretionary air travel.Global Environmental Change,42.
MLA Alcock I.,et al."‘Green’ on the ground but not in the air: Pro-environmental attitudes are related to household behaviours but not discretionary air travel".Global Environmental Change 42(2017).
条目包含的文件
条目无相关文件。
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[Alcock I.]的文章
[White M.P.]的文章
[Taylor T.]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[Alcock I.]的文章
[White M.P.]的文章
[Taylor T.]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[Alcock I.]的文章
[White M.P.]的文章
[Taylor T.]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。