CCPortal
DOI10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2017.12.003
Re-thinking the present: The role of a historical focus in climate change adaptation research
Adamson G.C.D.; Hannaford M.J.; Rohland E.J.
发表日期2018
ISSN0959-3780
起始页码195
结束页码205
卷号48
英文摘要There is a growing recognition that adaptation to climate change requires an understanding of social processes that unfold across extended temporal trajectories. Yet, despite a move to reconceptualise adaptation as ‘pathways of change and response’ with a deeper temporal dimension, the past generally remains poorly integrated into adaptation studies. This is related to a disavowal of environmental determinism within the academic field of history, which has caused the past to be addressed from other disciplinary perspectives within climate change literature, leading to accusations of over-simplification and neo-determinism. Conversely, whilst a relatively small amount of research within the subdiscipline of historical climatology has engaged with theories from mainstream adaptation to understand societies in the past, there has been little influence in the other direction. Building on a comprehensive review and critique of existing approaches to historical climate-society research, we argue for three important areas where historians should engage with climate change adaptation. The first area we call particularizing adaptation; this is the development of long-term empirical studies that uncover societal relations to climate in a particular place – including climate's cultural dimensions – which can provide a baseline and contextualisation for climate change adaptation options. The second, institutional path dependency and memory, argues for a focus on the evolution of formal institutions with a responsibility for adaptation, to understand how historical events and decisions inform and constrain practices today. Our third argument is for an appreciation of the history of ideas and concepts that underpin climate change adaptation. We call for a second-order observation – observation of the observers – within climate change research, to ensure that adaptation does not perpetuate historically-grown power structures. © 2017 Elsevier Ltd
英文关键词Adaptation; Culture; Determinism; Development; History; Path-dependency
学科领域adaptive management; climate change; conceptual framework; culture; dependency; empirical analysis; environmental factor; interdisciplinary approach; nature-society relations; recognition; research work; temporal analysis
语种英语
scopus关键词adaptive management; climate change; conceptual framework; culture; dependency; empirical analysis; environmental factor; interdisciplinary approach; nature-society relations; recognition; research work; temporal analysis
来源期刊Global Environmental change
文献类型期刊论文
条目标识符http://gcip.llas.ac.cn/handle/2XKMVOVA/117177
作者单位Department of Geography, King's College London, Strand, London, WC2R 2LS, United Kingdom; Department of History, Utrecht University, Drift 6, Utrecht, BS 3512, Netherlands; Department of Iberian and Latin American History, Centre for InterAmerian Studies (CIAS), Faculty of History, Philosophy and Theology, Bielefeld University, Universitätsstraße 25, Bielefeld, 33615, Germany
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Adamson G.C.D.,Hannaford M.J.,Rohland E.J.. Re-thinking the present: The role of a historical focus in climate change adaptation research[J],2018,48.
APA Adamson G.C.D.,Hannaford M.J.,&Rohland E.J..(2018).Re-thinking the present: The role of a historical focus in climate change adaptation research.Global Environmental change,48.
MLA Adamson G.C.D.,et al."Re-thinking the present: The role of a historical focus in climate change adaptation research".Global Environmental change 48(2018).
条目包含的文件
条目无相关文件。
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[Adamson G.C.D.]的文章
[Hannaford M.J.]的文章
[Rohland E.J.]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[Adamson G.C.D.]的文章
[Hannaford M.J.]的文章
[Rohland E.J.]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[Adamson G.C.D.]的文章
[Hannaford M.J.]的文章
[Rohland E.J.]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。