气候变化领域集成服务门户(CCPortal): Land use options for staying within the Planetary Boundaries – Synergies and trade-offs between global and local sustainability goals

CCPortal

DOI	10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2018.02.004
	Land use options for staying within the Planetary Boundaries – Synergies and trade-offs between global and local sustainability goals
	Heck V.; Hoff H.; Wirsenius S.; Meyer C.; Kreft H.
发表日期	2018
ISSN	0959-3780
起始页码	73
结束页码	84
卷号	49
英文摘要	In this paper we develop and assess alternative global land use patterns, guided by the Planetary Boundaries framework, to quantify land use opportunities for staying within the safe environmental operating space. Through a simulation based multi-criteria land use optimisation procedure, we determine the potential upper bounds of improved terrestrial carbon storage and of biodiversity conservation, while also meeting the Planetary Boundaries of land and water use and ensuring improved food supply for a population of 9 billion people. We present alternative global land use scenarios that could simultaneously yield better outcomes on all of these goals, in particular if substantial increases in agricultural productivity are realised. Terrestrial carbon sequestration potentials reach 98 GtC, whereas the potential reduction of the risk to biodiversity is 53%. Furthermore, we analyse the potential synergies and trade-offs of these global land use scenarios with national- and local-level environmental and developmental goals such as those specified in the SDGs, e.g. related to nature conservation, afforestation, bioenergy, employment and equity. This model-based information on synergies and trade-offs between different sustainability goals at different scales can be used in scientific assessments of transformation pathways, in policy making, in support of improved horizontal and vertical policy coherence and multi-level institutional solutions, as well as in SDG implementation, sustainable production and consumption (SDG 12) and global partnership mechanisms (SDG 17). © 2018 Elsevier Ltd
英文关键词	Biodiversity; Carbon sequestration; Land use; Optimisation; Planetary Boundaries; Sustainable Development Goals
学科领域	afforestation; agricultural production; biodiversity; bioenergy; carbon sequestration; conservation status; employment; environmental policy; equity; food supply; global perspective; land use change; nature conservation; optimization; policy implementation; policy making; sustainable development; terrestrial environment
语种	英语
scopus关键词	afforestation; agricultural production; biodiversity; bioenergy; carbon sequestration; conservation status; employment; environmental policy; equity; food supply; global perspective; land use change; nature conservation; optimization; policy implementation; policy making; sustainable development; terrestrial environment
来源期刊	Global Environmental change
文献类型	期刊论文
条目标识符	http://gcip.llas.ac.cn/handle/2XKMVOVA/117160
作者单位	Earth System Analysis, Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research, Germany; Department of Geography, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Germany; Water and Development Research Group, Aalto University, Finland; Resources and Development, Stockholm Environment Institute, Sweden; Department of Space, Earth and Environment, Chalmers University of Technology, Sweden; Macroecology & Society, German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle-Jena-Leipzig, Germany; Faculty of Biosciences, Pharmacy and Psychology, University of Leipzig, Germany; Biodiversity, Macroecology and Biogeography, Georg-August-University Göttingen, Germany
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714	Heck V.,Hoff H.,Wirsenius S.,等. Land use options for staying within the Planetary Boundaries – Synergies and trade-offs between global and local sustainability goals[J],2018,49.
APA	Heck V.,Hoff H.,Wirsenius S.,Meyer C.,&Kreft H..(2018).Land use options for staying within the Planetary Boundaries – Synergies and trade-offs between global and local sustainability goals.Global Environmental change,49.
MLA	Heck V.,et al."Land use options for staying within the Planetary Boundaries – Synergies and trade-offs between global and local sustainability goals".Global Environmental change 49(2018).