Climate Change Data Portal
DOI | 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2018.02.010 |
Integration anxiety: The cognitive isolation of climate change | |
Findlater K.M.; Donner S.D.; Satterfield T.; Kandlikar M. | |
发表日期 | 2018 |
ISSN | 0959-3780 |
起始页码 | 178 |
结束页码 | 189 |
卷号 | 50 |
英文摘要 | Experts recommend that decision-makers in climate-vulnerable sectors integrate, or ‘mainstream’ climate change adaptation into their decision-making. Farmers are often thought to do so intuitively, because many climate change impacts will manifest in similar ways to the weather and climate variability that farmers have always faced. However, there is little evidence to suggest whether farmers are already doing this, how they should go about it, and how hard it might be. Here we show that commercial grain farmers in South Africa (N = 90), as a uniquely informative group, are struggling to mainstream climate change risk management despite their apparent incentive, capacity and willingness to adapt. They perform large-scale, highly mechanized, input-intensive grain farming like their peers in higher-income countries (e.g., the United States, Canada, Europe and Australia), but without the government subsidies, crop insurance and irrigation more common in other regions. They are therefore motivated to adapt proactively because they are more vulnerable to the financial harms of weather and climate risks. Our data show that they are explicitly sensitive to the risks of climate change, generally expressing concern for its potential impacts, reporting observed changes, proposing possible adaptations, and expressing the desire to adapt proactively. However, their mental models of climate change (n = 30) are linguistically and structurally isolated from their mental models of weather and other ‘normal’ risks. They are therefore implicitly insensitive to climate change, making it unlikely that they will adapt proactively and rationally to this uncertain risk that they otherwise appear well-equipped to manage. © 2018 Elsevier Ltd |
英文关键词 | Climate change adaptation; Conservation agriculture; Decision making; Mainstreaming; Mental models; Risk perceptions |
学科领域 | adaptive management; climate change; climate effect; cognition; decision making; farming system; insurance system; nature-society relations; risk assessment; risk perception; subsidy system; subsistence agriculture; Australia; Canada; Europe; South Africa; United States |
语种 | 英语 |
scopus关键词 | adaptive management; climate change; climate effect; cognition; decision making; farming system; insurance system; nature-society relations; risk assessment; risk perception; subsidy system; subsistence agriculture; Australia; Canada; Europe; South Africa; United States |
来源期刊 | Global Environmental change |
文献类型 | 期刊论文 |
条目标识符 | http://gcip.llas.ac.cn/handle/2XKMVOVA/117142 |
作者单位 | Institute for Resources, Environment and Sustainability, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada; African Climate & Development Initiative, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa; Department of Geography, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada; School of Public Policy and Global Affairs, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada |
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Findlater K.M.,Donner S.D.,Satterfield T.,et al. Integration anxiety: The cognitive isolation of climate change[J],2018,50. |
APA | Findlater K.M.,Donner S.D.,Satterfield T.,&Kandlikar M..(2018).Integration anxiety: The cognitive isolation of climate change.Global Environmental change,50. |
MLA | Findlater K.M.,et al."Integration anxiety: The cognitive isolation of climate change".Global Environmental change 50(2018). |
条目包含的文件 | 条目无相关文件。 |
除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。