CCPortal
DOI10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.05.298
Life-cycle impact and exergy based resource use assessment of torrefied and non-torrefied briquette use for heat and electricity generation
Alanya-Rosenbaum, Sevda; Bergman, Richard D.
发表日期2019
ISSN0959-6526
EISSN1879-1786
卷号233页码:918-931
英文摘要

Forest residue biomass can be used as bioenergy feedstock, however, issues associated with its properties including low density and high moisture content constrains its valorization. Using mobile conversion technologies that can operate in remote areas and are capable of converting forest residues into high quality energy products can address the issues associated with its valorization for renewable energy production. This study evaluated environmental sustainability of using an integrated novel system of semi-mobile biomass conversion technologies (BCTs) to utilize low-value forest residue biomass as high value bioenergy products. A cradle-to-grave life cycle assessment (LCA) and resource use assessment on a unit-process level was conducted for two bio-products: nontorrefied briquettes (NTB) and torrefied briquettes (TOB). Their use for production of useful thermal energy in wood stoves for domestic heating and electricity at power plants were investigated along with their alternatives. The analyses were performed with SimaPro 8.5 using the DATASMART database. The impact assessment results showed a notable decrease in global warming (GW) impact when substituting fossil fuels with these two bioproducts. Specifically, for domestic heating on an equivalent energy basis, a 50% substitution of propane with NTB and TOB showed GHG emission reductions of 46% and 41%, respectively. For electricity generation, 10% cofiring at coal power plant with NTB and TOB showed GHG emission reductions of 6% and 8%, respectively. For the TOB supply chain, a large portion of the GW impact of the came from the torrefaction process and followed by the drying process. This was due to the propane use in these processes. Comparative analysis showed that near-woods biomass conversion for TOB production instead of processing feedstock at an in-town facility with access to grid electricity found 48%-55% lower GW impact for both electricity and heat generation scenarios, respectively. Resourced footprint analysis showed that most exergy extraction from the natural environment came from the drying process for NTB supply chain. In the TOB product system, torrefaction was the major contributor. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.


WOS研究方向Science & Technology - Other Topics ; Engineering ; Environmental Sciences & Ecology
来源期刊JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION
文献类型期刊论文
条目标识符http://gcip.llas.ac.cn/handle/2XKMVOVA/103034
作者单位US Forest Serv, USDA, Forest Prod Lab, 1 Gifford Pinchot Dr, Madison, WI 53726 USA
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Alanya-Rosenbaum, Sevda,Bergman, Richard D.. Life-cycle impact and exergy based resource use assessment of torrefied and non-torrefied briquette use for heat and electricity generation[J],2019,233:918-931.
APA Alanya-Rosenbaum, Sevda,&Bergman, Richard D..(2019).Life-cycle impact and exergy based resource use assessment of torrefied and non-torrefied briquette use for heat and electricity generation.JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION,233,918-931.
MLA Alanya-Rosenbaum, Sevda,et al."Life-cycle impact and exergy based resource use assessment of torrefied and non-torrefied briquette use for heat and electricity generation".JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION 233(2019):918-931.
条目包含的文件
条目无相关文件。
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[Alanya-Rosenbaum, Sevda]的文章
[Bergman, Richard D.]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[Alanya-Rosenbaum, Sevda]的文章
[Bergman, Richard D.]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[Alanya-Rosenbaum, Sevda]的文章
[Bergman, Richard D.]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。