CCPortal
DOI10.1080/14693062.2019.1617666
Effect of reciprocity on public opinion of international climate treaties: experimental evidence from the US and China
Stroik, Paul1; Chakraborty, D.2; Ge, W.3; Boulter, J.4,5; Jamelske, E.6
发表日期2019
ISSN1469-3062
EISSN1752-7457
卷号19期号:8页码:959-973
英文摘要

This study reports survey results of American and Chinese citizens administered to determine the effect of reciprocity and the absence of reciprocity on public support of international climate treaties. American and Chinese college students and adults were surveyed about their support for signing an international climate treaty including commitments to reduce their greenhouse gas emissions, conditional on the other country signing the same treaty or not. This study finds knowledge of other-country non-support on average decreases cooperative behaviour among all age groups in both the US and China. Knowledge of China's support for the treaty is found on average to increase support among American adults, while having no noticeable effect on average support among American college students. Chinese citizens are found to not respond positively to reciprocity. Although not statistically significant at conventional significance levels, knowledge of the US's support is found on average to decrease support among Chinese college students and adults. Key policy insights To increase support for international climate treaties, knowledge that another major emitter will sign the treaty does not unanimously increase domestic support. Knowing the other country will not sign the treaty decreases domestic support for signing an international climate treaty for both Americans and Chinese, relative to not being told about the other country's decision to sign the treaty. Knowing China will sign an international climate treaty on average increases American adult support for signing the same treaty, while American college student support is unaffected. Although not statistically significant at conventional significance levels, knowing the US will sign an international climate treaty on average decreases Chinese support for signing the same treaty. Policy-makers pursuing increased international support of climate treaties by first getting support from countries with substantial historical emissions might deter international support if little attention to fairness concerns is given.


WOS研究方向Environmental Sciences & Ecology ; Public Administration
来源期刊CLIMATE POLICY
文献类型期刊论文
条目标识符http://gcip.llas.ac.cn/handle/2XKMVOVA/102874
作者单位1.Northern Illinois Univ, Dept Econ, De Kalb, IL 60115 USA;
2.Univ Calif Irvine, Dept Econ, Irvine, CA 92717 USA;
3.Nanjing Agr Univ, Coll Econ & Management, Nanjing 210095, Jiangsu, Peoples R China;
4.Univ Wisconsin Eau Claire, Dept Chem, Eau Claire, WI USA;
5.Univ Wisconsin Eau Claire, Watershed Inst Collaborat Environm Studies, Eau Claire, WI USA;
6.Univ Wisconsin Eau Claire, Dept Econ, Eau Claire, WI USA
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Stroik, Paul,Chakraborty, D.,Ge, W.,et al. Effect of reciprocity on public opinion of international climate treaties: experimental evidence from the US and China[J],2019,19(8):959-973.
APA Stroik, Paul,Chakraborty, D.,Ge, W.,Boulter, J.,&Jamelske, E..(2019).Effect of reciprocity on public opinion of international climate treaties: experimental evidence from the US and China.CLIMATE POLICY,19(8),959-973.
MLA Stroik, Paul,et al."Effect of reciprocity on public opinion of international climate treaties: experimental evidence from the US and China".CLIMATE POLICY 19.8(2019):959-973.
条目包含的文件
条目无相关文件。
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[Stroik, Paul]的文章
[Chakraborty, D.]的文章
[Ge, W.]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[Stroik, Paul]的文章
[Chakraborty, D.]的文章
[Ge, W.]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[Stroik, Paul]的文章
[Chakraborty, D.]的文章
[Ge, W.]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。