Climate Change Data Portal
DOI | 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.05.143 |
InSmart - A methodology for combining modelling with stakeholder input towards EU cities decarbonisation | |
Simoes, S. G.1; Dias, L.1; Gouveia, J. P.1; Seixas, J.1; De Miglio, R.2; Chiodi, A.2; Gargiulo, M.2; Long, G.3; Giannakidis, G.4 | |
发表日期 | 2019 |
ISSN | 0959-6526 |
EISSN | 1879-1786 |
卷号 | 231页码:428-445 |
英文摘要 | In a world where an increasing share of the population lives in cities, its energy transition is gaining more relevance. The decision-making process in urban planning is frequently fragmented across departments considering different criteria. Integrated city planning approaches are not commonly employed, especially for the promotion of sustainable energy. This paper presents an innovative approach to promote holistic decision-support combining complex integrated city energy system models (ESM) with effective stakeholder input using a Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA). A holistic optimization city-ESM, based on the TIMES model generator, was developed and implemented in four European cities (Evora in Portugal, Cesena in Italy, Nottingham in UK and Trikala in Greece). Each city defined a range of future scenarios for sustainable energy promotion up to 2030 which were modelled in the city-ESM. The scenarios considered both individual measures, such as expansion of bicycle lanes, and combinations of measures. Going one step further from typical approaches in urban energy modelling, the modelling work was carried out in close cooperation with city stakeholders whom participated not only in the definition of the modelled scenarios, but also on the critical review of the modelling results. This review was conducted through a MCDA exercise which considered both quantitative and qualitative criteria in the selection of candidate scenarios to be implemented. It was found that there are substantial differences in most desirable scenarios if the MCDA is performed as well or if only the city-ESM model results are considered. The critical review of quantitative modelling results and their ranking via the MCDA led to improved communication of model results to non-modellers, which in turn made possible a better scrutiny and improvement of the modelling. It is concluded that at an urban level is important to combine qualitative analysis with quantitative modelling to identify the optimum mix of measures for a sustainable urban energy future. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. |
WOS研究方向 | Science & Technology - Other Topics ; Engineering ; Environmental Sciences & Ecology |
来源期刊 | JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION |
文献类型 | 期刊论文 |
条目标识符 | http://gcip.llas.ac.cn/handle/2XKMVOVA/102823 |
作者单位 | 1.NOVA Univ Lisbon, NOVA Sch Sci & Technol, CENSE Ctr Environm & Sustainabil Res, P-2829516 Caparica, Portugal; 2.E4SMA Srl, Turin, Italy; 3.Univ Nottingham, Nottingham, England; 4.Ctr Renewable Energy Sources & Saving CRES, Athens, Greece |
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Simoes, S. G.,Dias, L.,Gouveia, J. P.,et al. InSmart - A methodology for combining modelling with stakeholder input towards EU cities decarbonisation[J],2019,231:428-445. |
APA | Simoes, S. G..,Dias, L..,Gouveia, J. P..,Seixas, J..,De Miglio, R..,...&Giannakidis, G..(2019).InSmart - A methodology for combining modelling with stakeholder input towards EU cities decarbonisation.JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION,231,428-445. |
MLA | Simoes, S. G.,et al."InSmart - A methodology for combining modelling with stakeholder input towards EU cities decarbonisation".JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION 231(2019):428-445. |
条目包含的文件 | 条目无相关文件。 |
除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。