CCPortal
DOI10.1111/1365-2664.13487
The differences between rewilding and restoring an ecologically degraded landscape
du Toit, Johan T.1; Pettorelli, Nathalie2
发表日期2019
ISSN0021-8901
EISSN1365-2664
英文摘要

Rewilding is a developing concept in ecosystem stewardship that involves reorganizing and regenerating wildness in an ecologically degraded landscape, with present and future ecosystem function being of higher consideration than historical benchmark conditions. This approach differs from ecosystem restoration but the two concepts are often conflated because (a) they both rely on similar management actions (at least initially) and (b) it can be erroneously assumed that they both aim for similar states of wildness. Rewilding and restoring both influence biodiversity, and common management actions such as species reintroductions (e.g. beavers or wolves) can be integral to a rewilding project. However, in contrast with restoration, rewilding has lower fidelity to taxonomic precedent and promotes taxonomic substitutions for extinct native species that once underpinned the delivery of key ecological functions. We suggest the adaptive cycle as the appropriate conceptual framework in which to distinguish rewilding from ecosystem restoration. The focus of restoration ecology is to return an ecosystem to as close to its former state as is possible after a major disturbance, by directly reinstating it on the 'foreloop' of the adaptive cycle. In contrast, rewilding draws from the 'backloop' by promoting reorganization and redevelopment of the ecosystem under changing environmental conditions. If environmental conditions have changed so significantly that a regime shift is inevitable, then rewilding can facilitate the development of a novel ecosystem to sustain the provision of ecosystem services. Synthesis and applications. Rewilding and restoring both have their places in biodiversity conservation. In each case, their respective merits should be weighed in relation to stakeholder priorities, prevailing and predicted environmental conditions, the level of biological organization targeted for management, and existing and future management capacity. We provide simple schematic decision-pathways to assist in exploring whether an ecologically degraded landscape might be a candidate for restoration, active rewilding, or passive rewilding.


WOS研究方向Biodiversity & Conservation ; Environmental Sciences & Ecology
来源期刊JOURNAL OF APPLIED ECOLOGY
文献类型期刊论文
条目标识符http://gcip.llas.ac.cn/handle/2XKMVOVA/102761
作者单位1.Utah State Univ, Dept Wildland Resources, Logan, UT 84322 USA;
2.Zool Soc London, Inst Zool, London, England
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
du Toit, Johan T.,Pettorelli, Nathalie. The differences between rewilding and restoring an ecologically degraded landscape[J],2019.
APA du Toit, Johan T.,&Pettorelli, Nathalie.(2019).The differences between rewilding and restoring an ecologically degraded landscape.JOURNAL OF APPLIED ECOLOGY.
MLA du Toit, Johan T.,et al."The differences between rewilding and restoring an ecologically degraded landscape".JOURNAL OF APPLIED ECOLOGY (2019).
条目包含的文件
条目无相关文件。
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[du Toit, Johan T.]的文章
[Pettorelli, Nathalie]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[du Toit, Johan T.]的文章
[Pettorelli, Nathalie]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[du Toit, Johan T.]的文章
[Pettorelli, Nathalie]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。