CCPortal
DOI10.1007/s10531-019-01806-8
Historical range of variability for restoration and management in Wisconsin
Hanberry, Brice B.1; Dey, Daniel C.2
发表日期2019
ISSN0960-3115
EISSN1572-9710
卷号28期号:11页码:2931-2950
英文摘要

In Wisconsin, as in other states, management goals sometimes include restoration of historical forest conditions, which may prepare forests to be more compatible with future climates, disturbances such as drought and fire, and forest health threats. We quantified historical (1830-1866) composition and structure to develop historical reference conditions for restoration and documented changes based on current (2005-2009) forest surveys in Wisconsin. We provided structural metrics, functional group composition, and forest types for 186 ecological land types, and we also summarized trends in composition and structure. Wisconsin forests historically were comprised of 46% oak or pine savanna or woodland, 6% pine forest, and 48% forests primarily consisting of late-successional eastern broadleaf forest species and early-successional northern mixed forest species; densities of these forest types ranged from 60 to 460trees/ha. In the Eastern Broadleaf Forest ecological division, increased composition of the early-successional and mid-successional eastern broadleaf forest groups (from 10 to 40%) and (planted) pine group (8-23%) occurred along with decreased fire-tolerant oak composition (from 65 to 23%). Density increased in current forests compared to historical forests by a factor of 2.2; despite increased density, basal area increased only slightly due to the presence of larger diameter trees in historical tree surveys. In the Northern Mixed Forest ecological division, increased composition of the mid-successional eastern broadleaf forest group (from 12 to 24%) and late-successional northern mixed forest group (from 10 to 17%) occurred due to decreased composition of the fire-tolerant pine group (from 17 to 9%) and late-successional eastern broadleaf forest group (from 30 to 20%). Density remained similar in current forests compared to historical forests but current basal area was 50% of historical basal area. The transition from open fire-tolerant oak and pine forests, with rarity of early-successional tree species, to closed forests composed of a variety of early- and mid-successional tree species parallels results from other research. Replacement of open oak or pine forest ecosystems by dense forests has moved Wisconsin outside of the historical range of variability, likely reducing plant and wildlife species associated with open oak and pine ecosystems.


WOS研究方向Biodiversity & Conservation ; Environmental Sciences & Ecology
来源期刊BIODIVERSITY AND CONSERVATION
文献类型期刊论文
条目标识符http://gcip.llas.ac.cn/handle/2XKMVOVA/102568
作者单位1.US Forest Serv, USDA, Rocky Mt Res Stn, Rapid City, SD 57702 USA;
2.Univ Missouri, USDA, US Forest Serv, Northern Res Stn, 202 Nat Resources Bldg, Columbia, MO 65211 USA
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Hanberry, Brice B.,Dey, Daniel C.. Historical range of variability for restoration and management in Wisconsin[J],2019,28(11):2931-2950.
APA Hanberry, Brice B.,&Dey, Daniel C..(2019).Historical range of variability for restoration and management in Wisconsin.BIODIVERSITY AND CONSERVATION,28(11),2931-2950.
MLA Hanberry, Brice B.,et al."Historical range of variability for restoration and management in Wisconsin".BIODIVERSITY AND CONSERVATION 28.11(2019):2931-2950.
条目包含的文件
条目无相关文件。
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[Hanberry, Brice B.]的文章
[Dey, Daniel C.]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[Hanberry, Brice B.]的文章
[Dey, Daniel C.]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[Hanberry, Brice B.]的文章
[Dey, Daniel C.]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。