CCPortal
DOI10.3390/rs11161875
Evaluation of Remotely-Sensed and Model-Based Soil Moisture Products According to Different Soil Type, Vegetation Cover and Climate Regime Using Station-Based Observations over Turkey
Bulut, Burak1; Yilmaz, M. Tugrul1; Afshar, Mehdi H.1; Sorman, A. Unal1; Yucel, Ismail1; Cosh, Michael H.2; Simsek, Osman3
发表日期2019
EISSN2072-4292
卷号11期号:16
英文摘要

This study evaluates the performance of widely-used remotely sensed- and model-based soil moisture products, including: The Advanced Scatterometer (ASCAT), the Advanced Microwave Scanning Radiometer-Earth Observing System (AMSR-E), the European Space Agency Climate Change Initiative (ESA-CCI), the Antecedent Precipitation Index (API), and the Global Land Data Assimilation System (GLDAS-NOAH). Evaluations are performed between 2008 and 2011 against the calibrated station-based soil moisture observations collected by the General Directorate of Meteorology of Turkey. The calibration of soil moisture observing sensors with respect to the soil type, correction of the soil moisture for the soil temperature, and the quality control of the collected measurements are performed prior to the evaluation of the products. Evaluation of remotely sensed- and model-based soil moisture products is performed considering different characteristics of the time series (i.e., seasonality and anomaly components) and the study region (i.e., soil type, vegetation cover, soil wetness and climate regime). The systematic bias between soil moisture products and in situ measurements is eliminated by using a linear rescaling method. Correlations between the soil moisture products and the in situ observations vary between 0.57 and 0.87, while the root mean square errors of the products versus the in situ observations vary between 0.028 and 0.043 m(3) m(-3). Overall, according to the correlation and root mean square error values obtained in all evaluation categories, NOAH and ESA-CCI soil moisture products perform better than all the other model- and remotely sensed-based soil moisture products. These results are valid for the entire study time period and all of the sub-categories under soil type, vegetation cover, soil wetness and climate regime.


WOS研究方向Remote Sensing
来源期刊REMOTE SENSING
文献类型期刊论文
条目标识符http://gcip.llas.ac.cn/handle/2XKMVOVA/100988
作者单位1.Middle East Tech Univ, Dept Civil Engn, TR-06800 Ankara, Turkey;
2.USDA ARS, Hydrol & Remote Sensing Lab, Beltsville Agr Res Ctr, Beltsville, MD 20705 USA;
3.Turkish Directorate Gen Meteorol, 6th Reg Directorate, TR-01220 Adana, Turkey
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Bulut, Burak,Yilmaz, M. Tugrul,Afshar, Mehdi H.,et al. Evaluation of Remotely-Sensed and Model-Based Soil Moisture Products According to Different Soil Type, Vegetation Cover and Climate Regime Using Station-Based Observations over Turkey[J],2019,11(16).
APA Bulut, Burak.,Yilmaz, M. Tugrul.,Afshar, Mehdi H..,Sorman, A. Unal.,Yucel, Ismail.,...&Simsek, Osman.(2019).Evaluation of Remotely-Sensed and Model-Based Soil Moisture Products According to Different Soil Type, Vegetation Cover and Climate Regime Using Station-Based Observations over Turkey.REMOTE SENSING,11(16).
MLA Bulut, Burak,et al."Evaluation of Remotely-Sensed and Model-Based Soil Moisture Products According to Different Soil Type, Vegetation Cover and Climate Regime Using Station-Based Observations over Turkey".REMOTE SENSING 11.16(2019).
条目包含的文件
条目无相关文件。
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[Bulut, Burak]的文章
[Yilmaz, M. Tugrul]的文章
[Afshar, Mehdi H.]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[Bulut, Burak]的文章
[Yilmaz, M. Tugrul]的文章
[Afshar, Mehdi H.]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[Bulut, Burak]的文章
[Yilmaz, M. Tugrul]的文章
[Afshar, Mehdi H.]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。